
Below is my Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone review of the book. This is the first book in the extremely popular Harry Potter series, as most of you already know.
I had been slightly intrigued by the Harry Potter phenomenon, but never enough to actually look into it on my own. I also have a natural dispensation against certain entertainment that involves blatant uses of the words “witchcraft” and “wizardry” (though the latter less-so, even though it’s pretty much the same thing) in such a blatant, cheerleading manner.
I’ll discuss this a bit more at the end of my review. So it was for the above reasons that I never actually checked the books (or movies) out myself. I also didn’t want to support them with my hard-earned cash, so I never bought them on my own. I finally got my hands on it though when a friend lent me her copy of the first book and film. I’ll review the film next. I must say if it wasn’t for her I probably wouldn’t have read them for quite some time. So thanks again Marissa.

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone is, in my opinion, something akin to Lord of the Rings-style fantasy lite. Going into the book, I knew next to nothing about Harry Potter. All my knowledge came from movie trailers, or from articles/reviews that I had read about the videogames.
As such, I was wholly ignorant about most aspects of the book and the world of Harry Potter. Striking me within the first chapter was the fact that Harry Potter is actually set in modern day times. This I did not know. From what I had seen, I gathered that it was set in some old historic period ala Lord of the Rings. I did not think technology or machines necessarily existed in the Harry Potter world. That was struck down within the first moments when Harry Potter is at his muggle (non-magic user) family household, where everything from cars to computer games is mentioned.
The second most striking aspect of the book to me was how straight-up fantasy-based it was. I never really thought about it I guess, but it has all the same elements you expect from pure fantasy, again in the Lord of the Rings-style. You’ve got trolls, goblins, centaur’s, unicorns, dragons . . . not to mention wizards, witches, spells, flying broomsticks, magic and all the rest. All the former (before the ellipses) is stuff I didn’t expect to see. Thus I found those elements surprising and entertaining.

The characters are done pretty well, and I ended up liking all of them. The storyline is also interesting, although it is more interesting when they go into the mythos of the world (and the sorcerer’s stone itself, where the book gets it’s title) than the school activity type stuff.
I thought the book read easily, though I was a bit surprised to see quite a few mentions of death or killing or whatnot. I don’t know why it is considered a children’s book. Not that kids can’t handle it, so I guess it’s a mute point. Heck I was watching Terminator 2 as a kid . . .

It has good character development as well, and you really feel by the end that you’ve learned quite a bit, not just about the world but also about the characters. I think my favorite parts of the book were: the section with the unicorn, when Harry is with his muggle family (both beginning and end), when Harry is initially learning about who he is (the picture of Hagrid in my mind was awesome) and the ending challenges sequence, which reminded me of a videogame. Where you had to solve a puzzle in each room to advance. I also liked the point system, as the kids at Hogwarts are awarded to points for their school group for their triumphs. With points taken away for breaking the rules as a form of punishment. These sections are used to great effect to build character for the main school kids in the books (Harry, Hermione and Ron) and I thought it was a unique idea.
Overall, the world was much more developed than I thought it would be, and the book is interesting all the way through. Though some parts more so than others. I also though the book did good at throwing a few twists in for good measure. The ending twist regarding Professor Snape is something that I SHOULD have seen coming a mile away, but for some reason or other I didn’t make the connection and it caught me by surprise. Twists are always a good thing.
The biggest con for the book in my opinion is that it reads a bit juvenile. Maybe this is to be expected considering it is supposed to be a children’s book (which I don’t by), but I found a few parts to be stupid or dumb, and I didn’t find the book funny either. The dialog can also fall into that dumb category on some occasions. But I suppose it’s to be expected when your story revolves around school kids.

Finally, we have the Christian perspective. I think people who are super conservative regarding anything magic-based being wrong, will not want to read this book. Obviously the whole book revolves around magic.
Which is described both with the term “magic” and the terms “witchcraft” and “wizardry”. Other words in that vein like sorcerer, enchant, spell, incantation, etc. are also frequent. I personally can look past this, because in the grand scheme of things it is not much different then the spells and magic and sorcery you see in games like the Final Fantasy titles, which I love.
The difference here is that it is glorified in a stronger manner and it is spoken-of in a manner that makes it seem mundane. That is, doing witchcraft is normal and everyone does it (except the non-magic users, who are called muggles. Not to be confused with the ultra-cute Moogles, creatures from Final Fantasy). Witchcraft is thus encouraged throughout the book and is seen as a force “for good”. And it is the non-understanding muggles who are painted as ignorant and prejudice because they do not agree with the use of magic (is this underlining liberal elitism towards conservative Christians? Maybe).

There are many different ways this type of thing can be interpreted, and some Christians simply won’t be able to get past the way it glorifies witchcraft. Which is not something I agree with. However I do not think it is as bad as I was told it was, and even though magic is an essential part of Harry Potter, the true focus is actually on plot and character; magic and the use and learning of it, are simply trappings within the story. And to the book’s credit, I think most of the plot would even be interesting if you stripped that stuff out (to the extent you could). As it deals with Harry discovering who he is, it deals with the loss of his family, and has strong themes of friendship, honor, determination and confronting evil which comes in the form of an evil wizard.
There are also many different ways you can find Christian themes in the book, or even use the book to make Christianity “relevant” by using what’s in it to make a positive connection. Ultimately, I would have to say that the book is NOT harmful and Christians shouldn’t be afraid of it. But if you don’t want to support it, as I didn’t, I would still stand by that decision. But I think if you find Harry Potter offensive, you’d also have to include a lot of other things under that same umbrella, from Disney properties to Lord of the Rings (written by a Christian) to Final Fantasy. Since they all contain the same basic fantasy elements, included but not limited to magic, sorcery, witchcrift and spellcraft. Which are, ultimately, the underlining basis of what makes a fantasy a fantasy.
In the end, I was pleasantly surprised by the book, but I don’t know if I would say it was “great”. I think it’s well made, and it has interesting elements with some unique aspects, but also some standard fare. I’m not gonna give it a rating, but if you find yourself intrigued or simply want to educate yourself on what this series is all about, then be sure to borrow the book from a friend or check it out from the library. I do recommend it in that regard.
I intend to read the rest of the series and watch all the movies. And heck, I just may play the videogames as well. Since Marissa is intent on making me into a Harry Potter maniac.
I don’t know if she’ll quite succeed, but there is at least one less muggle in the world. I don’t know if that’s a good or bad thing . . .
- Josh, the Elder